Crocker said arguments erupted when he accused Iran of providing direct support to extremist militias -- both training and actual weapons -- and that Washington had "the proof."
Qomi "took exception to that," Crocker said, adding that a "brief summary" of the evidence was provided by the United States at the talks.
"I said we are not here to prove something in a court of law. We are here to let them know we know what they are doing and it needs to stop," he said.
Tensions also spiked when the Iranians sought to "broaden the discussion," which was to be confined to Iraq.
Notice how they want to "broaden the discussion", but don't want to face the direct accusation? That's called deflection. It's a classic move when you've been caught doing something wrong red handed. The Iranians know that the evidence is mounting and that sooner or later, if they keep it up, things are going to get very ugly for them. So they decided to deflect to a different topic because they knew they were wrong and they were had.
Liberals love to tell you how horrible it would be if we attacked the "innocent" Iranians, but they can't seem to explain away the Iranian made weapons or the $10,000 sniper rifles that were ordered by the Iranian government but seemed to have found their way into the hands of insurgents.
Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com
No comments:
Post a Comment