Of course, he doesn't quite come out and say it, but you know deep down he thinks that Bush either had a hand in 9/11 or let it happen. Take a look at these comments:
It's almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that," Mr Ellison said. "After the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the leader [Hitler] of that country in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted.""
Mr Ellison said he would not accuse the Bush administration of planning 9/11 because "you know, that's how they put you in the nut-ball box - dismiss you".
Well if you're comparing Bush to Hitler, who was responsible for the deaths of 6 million people, I think you're a bit stretching it here. Of course, I'm going to put you in the nut-ball box for your comments about the Reichstag fire. You state that "they blamed the Communists for it" and then put Hitler into power with unlimited authority.
Tell me, how does "blaming it on the Communists" not put you in the nut-ball box? You yourself believe that Osama Bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks, so how is it that anyone is blaming anyone besides Osama?
A convert to Islam who was previously linked to the extremist Nation of Islam.
NOW we're starting to see how his line of thinking works. We all remember the NOI leader Farrakhan right? The same guy that said "Hitler was a very great man". You'll have to excuse me if I don't exactly buy into this guy's line of thinking. It would be the same thing if I told you all about how Al Sharpton eats puppies, but I used to be a member of the KKK or something. Everything I say becomes suspect if that were true.
When Bush starts ordering American citizens be rounded up and tortured to death on a grand scale, THEN you can make the Hitler comparison, until then, you're just plain wrong.
Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com
Monday, July 16, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment