First they are trying to develop nuclear weapons. Then they are actively supporting the insurgency in Iraq. Then they are giving insurgents access to weapons that are easily traceable back to them. Now, they are actively supporting the Taliban in Afghanistan.
They are doing absolutely everything they can to alienate any and all international support they have over their nuclear program and other issues that are of a concern to the international community. One thing is funny though: Iran is in “outright violation” of U.N. Security Council resolutions.
So if that's the case, then we can expect Russia and China to vote for additional sanctions against Iran right? If they oppose them now, it gives credence to the fact that the UN is a toothless organization that is willing to do nothing because they don't want to rock the boat. Russia and China have got to be feeling the pressure to get Iran to see things everyone else's way. If not, they are in for a rude awakening as people are getting tired of Iran's bullshit.
Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Hi Travis. I love your strong attitude, and you probably won't fight a bigger mouth, with exactly the opposite attitude than you, trying to solve the same problem.
Yes I am for non violent resistance. Yes I don't like the Seyyeds in Iran. Seyyeds, who are they you say?
And that is the whole point of me taking the time to write you this note. Do not mix real Iranians with alien Iranians called Seyyeds. If you read Iranian history, Iranians come from the most civilized roots. We real Iranians have been hostage to these Seyyeds since the first one (Khomeini) was deemed by President Carter, as some evangelical saviour for Iran.
So do me and a lot of normal civilized Iranians a favour. Don't mix us up with them.
Ali,
I would love nothing more then a non violent way out of the Iranian nuclear issue. I know not to mix civilians (Seyyeds or not) with their government (I hope you would do me the same favor in return. :) ) However, with evidence mounting that Iran is actively supporting people (I have many articles on the subject) who are killing American soldiers and Iraqi civilians, I cannot stand idly by and not say anything. You yourself made the distinction NON VIOLENT resistance. Perhaps if the Iranian government stuck its hand out in friendship instead of sticking a bomb on every street corner, they wouldn't be feeling the pressure of additional sanctions.
That being said, I am glad you posted on my site. Debate over a subject is healthy and I welcome that. :) Also, I'm no fan of President Carter, so you have my apologies for him. :)
I'm all for a "live and let live" policy between nations, but you cannot ignore evidence that one side isn't "letting live".
Travis
Travis
The people who "who are killing American soldiers and Iraqi civilians" as you put it, are people who believe in the Seyyed ideology. To go into that takes a long time, and this is not the place for that.
It is just a shame that the US press and commentators do not see the Iran that stems from Zoroaster, and Cyrus the Great. Please see Iran as the mother of Human Rights. It is not the Iran that these hijackers are portraying.
And Hijackers they are. The whole of Iranian population, that believes in Nowrooz first before anything else, have as much as they could non violently by-passed these Seyyeds and their Basij army. Remember the Hitler youth? Same thing.
What I want commentators like yourself to do, is to put their comments in the correct syntax. That's all. Once the whole world media does this, then the moral argument is clearly apparent to the Seyyeds.
Unfortunately though, the only thing that is happening, is that the left wing in EU uses the tension between the US Republican and Seyyeds, to criticise the US Republicans.
One can say that GWB uses the Seyyeds' ideology to drum up votes in US. He got so much money from Iranian Americans, but what happened to Iran. If anything all that Jaw Jaw, helped the US and Seyyed forces get more money. Money that should have been spent on the poor in both countries.
I hope you understand, some of the very elementary views I have.
ali, I wonder if you are in fact waxing nostalgic about the pre-revolution Iran too much. I have to wonder if there is a royalist agenda beneath your words.
Who are the 'real' Iranians you talk about? are you a real Iranian, or just an exile? I can understand that you feel that the Iranian establishment doesn't represent the will of the people but what government does?
Just an exile trying to do his bit to save his country. And every little counts. It might take a long time, but we will get there.
So Ali, tell me. What's your stance on Iran's nuclear program? Do you think that it's for energy creation only? What about the expensive sniper rifles that were ordered by the Iranian government from an arms manufacturer that are now showing up in the hands of insurgents? I do enjoy a healthy debate, so I thought I'd ask someone who's lived in Iran's opinion.
Hey Travis, tell me, you know those guns we gave the Mudjahadeen back in the 80's...
Travis I do not live in Iran, but the opposition were the first people to give the world a wake up call.
The Seyyeds in Iran are a bunch of wacko nutcases that think their dogma should rule the world etc etc
But what I do not understand is how the US intelligence never exposed any of this.
It seems to me that the US wanted to benefit from all this, by using Iran as a tool to get into Eastern Europe with their new shield.
Post a Comment