I want you all to see this, especially the 9/11 "truther's" out there. A gas truck was traveling on a California highway and crashed. The resulting fire and explosion weakened the steel structure that was holding up the section of the freeway and it collapsed upon itself. No explosives, government conspiracies, or any other sinister forces brought that freeway section down. Just simple heat, damage, and weight of the supported section.
Why is it so hard for people to believe that the same thing happened on 9/11? I support investigations across the board, but when NOT ONE structural engineer claims anything happened other than what the government said happened on 9/11, it kind of tells you something doesn't it?
It tells you that your piecing together of little bits of evidence to support your theory that doesn't fit with the official version, yet declining to take into account all of the rest of the evidence means you're not seeking "the truth". You're seeking "fame and fortune". Just ask the "Loose Change" folks. They're full of shit too, but they are selling a ton of DVD's of their movie.
So according to them, would this be the second time in history that steel was weakened or melted due to fire?
Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com
Monday, April 30, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment