Watch how this idiot likes to point the finger at the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has such a blatant bias, it's not even funny. What's worse is that while he does mention Afghanistan, you can see that he cannot tell the difference between both wars.
He also makes no distinction that everyone was and is for the war in Afghanistan. You remember, to get Osama? I guess this guy just wants to be a historical revisionist. But no matter, he just wants ratings and people pissed off, so he asks the inflammatory statement "what should we do with the money", and yet, only one person makes a reasonable statement "Why do we need to spend the money" if we're not spending it on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Cafferty simply fails to mention to his audience that if we weren't at war, we wouldn't be borrowing money to pay for the war. Period. Yet, in his "journalistic integrity", he makes inflammatory questions that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.
For example, if you weren't paying rent, what could you do with the money? If you weren't paying a car payment, what could you do with the money? Well there's all sorts of pie in the sky ideas that money could better be spent on, but the simple fact remains is that the money is needed elsewhere.
I just get irritated by "journalists" who don't simply report the news anymore. It's always with a political slant or bias instead of just "X happened today".
Travis
No comments:
Post a Comment