He's really irritated with the recent comments by Rudy Guiliani where Guiliani stated that Democrats would put this country on the defensive and America would be less safe, (which is correct).
He asks "Which party did what the terrorists wanted in postponing elections". WHAT?? I don't ever remember Osama saying "Death To America! And Allah willing, we will postpone your elections". He asks "Which party rode roughshod over American's rights while saying that they were protecting those rights". What he doesn't mention is that after 9/11, Keith himself asked "Why wasn't more done", yet, when more is being done, he complains about it being too much.
He asks "Which party took us into the most underly backwards, underly counterproductive, underly ruinous war in our history" So what he's really saying is that regardless of Clinton saying that Saddam had WMD's, the intelligence communities all around the world saying Saddam had WMD's, Russian intelligence saying after 9/11 that Saddam was planning attacks on American soil, that the Iraq war is not justified?
How much do you need Mr. Olbermann before you act? Do you need to see buildings collapsing for you to act? Do you need to see people dead in the street from chemical attacks before you act Mr. Olbermann? Are you saying we shouldn't have gone in and Saddam should be alive and in power to this day? The fact is that after 9/11, we could not take anything for granted. We saw what 19 young men with determination and ingenuity could do to our people. What do you suppose those same people could do with the backing of a nation?
He goes on to ask "which party was in charge when 9/11 happened"? But what he doesn't mention is what party was in charge when the threat of Bin Laden was growing? What party was in charge when terrorist attacks kept happening to American's abroad? What party was in charge when we had Bin Laden in our sights and let him go over a financial deal? Keith doesn't want to answer those questions because it would show the Democrats repeated failure to take threats seriously enough.
I'm not apologizing for Bush's mistakes. Had he been more aggressive, we might still have the WTC standing. However, Clinton had a KNOWN THREAT IN HIS SIGHTS and called it off because we might end up killing the prince of the UAE.
Keith doesn't want to mention that. Keith doesn't want to acknowledge that the Democrat's favorite guy failed in such a spectacular fashion that had he acted properly, well over 3,000 people would be alive today.
Hey Keith, how about instead of getting angry at the guy who points out the truth, how about you and other Democrats actually get a track record of DOING something about a threat.
The ultimate irony Mr. Olbermann is that you quote Franklin Roosevelt's famous "We have nothing to fear but fear itself", yet you ignore one of his other famous quotes which he ironically made on September 11th, but in 1944
"When You See a Rattlesnake Poised to Strike, You Do Not Wait Until He Has Struck Before You Crush Him"
Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com
No comments:
Post a Comment