So, she doesn't have a problem with the firing of all 93 attorneys her husband did when he came into office. She has a problem with the recent firing of 8 attorneys. Now she even admits that if elected, she'll probably fire all attorneys appointed by President Bush. She says she's just "following traditions". Is that right? I don't seem to remember a lot of other presidents doing that.
How is it that this woman is even on the radar of the Democratic party's list of potential Presidential candidates? Oh. Right. The double standard and hypocracy part. I forgot. :)
Travis
travis@rightwinglunatic.com
Monday, March 26, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You might want to check your historical facts here. Generally, a newly elected president replaces the attorney's that don't mesh with their political philosophy. The unique thing that bush did was fire these attorneys mid-term. You are retarded.
There is no real difference between firing them mid term or not. There was nothing illegal done here. It's a non story. However, I'm pointing out is that Hillary has a double standard when it comes to these firings. Perhaps you missed the title of my story? Where's your source for your statement of "generally, a newly elected president replaces attorney's" statement of fact? Retarded? I've had almost 1,200 posts on here with less then 5 having posts where people question my facts. Hardly a "retarded" percentage wouldn't you agree? I doubt you could maintain a percentage that high.
Post a Comment