Thursday, December 06, 2007

Iran and Tim

Most of the things I've been writing about lately have been dealing with the Middle East and specifically Iran and Iraq.  Since most of today's stories have been about Iran, I thought it would be beating a dead horse, so I posted about other topics.

As a side note, I want to introduce Tim, my new contributing writer.

Tim has been a friend of mine for many years and him and I have frequent political discussions in my office or whenever we are out with the family.  So I decided to invite him on here to pop in anytime he wishes and post articles and opinion pieces.

So let's welcome Naval Veteran Tim!

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

I've been banned

So seeing as how I get a lot of hate mail from the folks over at the democratic underground, I thought it would be nice if I jump into their forums and see what I've been missing out on.

Well I guess I'm more "progressive" then they are, because when a topic of the mortgage situation came up, I offered my two cents on what people should do with their own personal finances.

I even told them that I did not personally care if someone was a Democrat or a Republican, but that my information was helpful and would prevent a lot of heartache for people looking to buy a home.

Well I went onto my "account" there after 15 minutes to see who had replied to my thread, and I found that I was banned.

I think I was banned for this reason:

Who We Are: Democratic Underground is an online community for Democrats and other progressives. Members are expected to be generally supportive of progressive ideals, and to support Democratic candidates for political office. Democratic Underground is not affiliated with the Democratic Party, and comments posted here are not representative of the Democratic Party or its candidates.

So because I wasn't going to kiss Democratic ass, I was banned.

So, this begs the question:

When I have people who bash me and my Republican views and I don't ban them or delete their comments, am I more liberal then the liberals who don't adhere to my strict standards?

I try to be fair in regards to political debate by allowing both sides to make their case be heard by the public in general.  So, unless someone's a spammer or committing a crime, I don't take down their posts.

Yet, I can't seem to get the same courtesy from the other side of the aisle.

I guess I'll just add it to one more chapter in my pointing out Democratic hypocrisy.  And here I thought I was dealing with rational people.  Silly me. :)

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

A Proud American

Zachary Fisher was a prominent figure in the New York real estate community and a major philanthropic benefactor for the men and women in the United States Armed Forces, as well as numerous other not-for-profit organizations.

A native of Brooklyn, New York, Mr. Fisher began working in construction at the age of 16. Shortly thereafter, he and his brothers, Martin and Larry, joined forces to form Fisher Brothers, which has grown into one of the real estate industry's premier residential and commercial developers, owning more than five million square feet of office space.

From the earliest days of his construction career, Mr. Fisher was a strong supporter of the U.S. Armed Forces. Prevented from active service in World War II due to a leg injury, Mr. Fisher drew on his building skills to assist the U.S. Coastal Service in the construction of coastal fortifications. His patronage of the Armed Forces became an ongoing concern from that time, evolving to occupy increasing amounts of his energies.
In the 1970s, while remaining active in Fisher Brothers, Mr. Fisher's commitment to both the Armed Forces and other philanthropic causes intensified still further through his leadership role in a number of major projects.

In 1978, he founded the Intrepid Museum Foundation to save the historic and battle-scarred aircraft carrier INTREPID from the scrap yard. Four years of involvement with the Foundation resulted in his spearheading the opening of the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum in New York City, now the world's largest naval museum.

In 1982, the same year as the Museum's opening, Mr. Fisher established the Zachary and Elizabeth M. Fisher Armed Services Foundation. Through the Foundation, he made significant contributions to the families of the victims of the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983. Since then, the Foundation has made contributions of $25,000 to numerous military families who have lost loved ones under tragic circumstances.

Mr. Fisher made similar donations to the families of New York City firefighters who lost their lives in the line of duty. His Armed Services Foundation also provides scholarship funds to active and former service members and their families.

In 1990, Mr. and Mrs. Fisher began the Fisher House™ program, dedicating more than $20 million to the construction of comfort homes for families of hospitalized military personnel. Twenty-nine Fisher Houses™ now operate at 17 military bases and at five Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers throughout the nation. More than 183,000 days of lodging are provided by Fisher Houses™ every year, saving families an estimated $5 million annually. Since the program's inception, more than 50,000 families have stayed in Fisher Houses™.
In 1994, Mr. Fisher, in partnership with David Rockefeller, established the Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation, which funds Alzheimer's disease research with the goal of finding a cause and cure. The Foundation operates the nation's largest and most modern Alzheimer's research laboratory, housed at The Rockefeller University in New York City.

Throughout his life, Mr. Fisher held a number of posts on a variety of charitable and arts organizations and military charities throughout the country. He served as Honorary Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Marine Corps - Law Enforcement Foundation and was a supporter of the Coast Guard Foundation, the Navy League and other military charities. Mr. Fisher also established the annual Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Award for Excellence in Military Medicine.
He was a major supporter of the Metropolitan Opera, Temple Israel, the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs, the George C. Marshall Foundation, the Margaret Thatcher Foundation, the Reagan Presidential Library, the United Jewish Appeal and many other organizations. Mr. Fisher also served on the boards of Carnegie Hall and several other institutions and received honorary doctorate degrees from the Massachusetts Maritime Academy and the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.

In 1998, Mr. Fisher received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Bill Clinton in honor of his wide-ranging contributions on behalf of the young men and women in the US Armed Forces. He also received the Horatio Alger Award, the Volunteer Action Award, the Presidential Citizens Medal, the Senior Civilian Award from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretary of Defense, as well as the top awards a civilian can receive from each branch of the military.
Separately, Presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Bill Clinton, as well as Margaret Thatcher and the late Yitzak Rabin, recognized Mr. Fisher for his support of charitable organizations throughout the United States.
In December, 1999, President Clinton signed Public Law 106-161 conferring upon Zachary Fisher the status of an honorary veteran in the U. S. Armed Forces. He was recommended for this honor prior to his death on June 4, 1999.
Three words, etched in the marble of Zachary Fisher's tomb, speak to his legacy:
Builder ... Philanthropist ... Patriot

ZACHARY FISHER
FOUNDER
Fisher House™ PROGRAM
September 26, 1910 -- June 4, 1999

Courtesy of The Fisher House Website.

This is man who spent 60 years trying to make a difference in the lives of others especially the military. His biggest contribution to military families was the founding of the Fisher House program. That provides temporary lodging for families of wounded veterans usually on the grounds of the hospital.

Thank you Mr. Fisher and god bless

Tim

tim@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

NIE And Olbermann

Oh Mr. Olbermann, how I do enjoy you.  You open your mouth now about the NIE report, yet, you simply either didn't read it or you ignored vast portions of it:

"In sum: A stopped program could be restarted by passing knowledge Iran does not have to a hidden program of the existence of which there is no evidence."

 

 

He asked about vindication but yet, the report actually DOES vindicate the Bush administration in their concerns over Iran's covert nuclear program, which the NIE actually does say existed.

The Ambassador Sherman woman says "the American people don't know what to believe", yet the NIE TELLS YOU what happened, if you want to believe that report.

He then goes on to talk about this statement in the NIE ""We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program."  But what he leaves off is this statement "We also assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons"

Now of course, the Ambassador shows her bias by saying that all the Democratic nominees for President support "vigorous diplomacy", yet she fails to mention that many Republican ones do as well.

Stop cherry picking your statements Olbermann.  You're starting to act like you claim Bush does.  I thought you were more interested in the truth rather than the partisan politics?

Oh well, I guess it's really my fault.  I thought you were a journalist, instead of a former sportscaster who simply is looking for headlines instead of looking for the truth.

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

 

Monitoring Agency Praises U.S. Report, but Keeps Wary Eye on Iran

To be frank, we are more skeptical,” a senior official close to the agency said. “We don’t buy the American analysis 100 percent. We are not that generous with Iran.”

The official called the American assertion that Iran had “halted” its weapons program in 2003 “somewhat surprising.”

That the nuclear watchdog agency based in Vienna is sounding a somewhat tougher line than the Bush administration is surprising, given that the administration has long criticized it for not pressuring Iran hard enough to curb its nuclear program.

Wow, I'm....shocked.  The UN is usually filled to the rafters with appeasers and sissies when it comes to dealing with direct threats like Iran.

“We are still worried about certain aspects of Iran’s nuclear program, and we need answers, particularly about so-called military aspects of the program,” said the senior official close to the agency.

Dr. ElBaradei’s most recent report to his agency’s 35-country board last month is less categorical in its conclusions than the American finding.

The agency acknowledged there were still “outstanding issues” regarding the scope and nature of the nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz and activities that could have military applications, Dr. ElBaradei said.

They are starting to sound like a backbone might be growing in there somewhere.

But I won't hold my breath, I've seen the UN do just about everything they can to knife the US in the back, so this may all be just for show. :(

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

35 percent of toys contain lead, report says

You know, there's an easy way to fix this.  Stop bringing these toys in from China until they get their act together.  Test at the border.  If they don't pass, then the shipment is sent back.

It's really not that hard people.  Japan does it, why can't we?

“There’s a lot of doom and gloom about lead in the products — people only hear about the recalls,” said Jeff Gearhart, the Ecology Center’s campaign director. “Companies can make clean products. Our sampling shows that there’s no reason to put lead in a product.

Exactly!  Why does a Hannah Montana pop star card game even NEED lead?

And of course, there's a little bit of a conspiracy theorist in me that wonders if this is an attack against the US by the Chinese government.  I know the odds of it being true are so low, it's almost impossible, but if you think about this:  China wants to be the new "US".  However, they don't want competition.  What better way then to poison the children of your competitor?

The Hannah Montana game has 6 times the level considered safe of lead.  Why does it even NEED the lead?  China simply is cutting corners trying to make as much money as possible.  Now, they are finding out the true cost of doing that is irreparable damage to their reputation as a manufacturer.

Sooner or later, these companies are going to see the problem with manufacturing things in China, and will move operations.

For example: 

With the falling dollar, the cost savings of manufacturing in China is becoming smaller as the days go by.

If the cost isn't there, then all a company has to do is move operations to some remote part of the country, say Montana or Iowa, for lack of a better example.

Pay a wage that's above the medium in that area, and you'll get decent workers.

Then you can adhere to all safety standards, and put a "Made in the USA" label on every toy.

You employ American workers, you don't have to worry about foreign governments, tariffs, or any other international trade problems, you get a marketing coup, and you get to have the most rigorous controls over your product that you want.

It's win-win-win all the way around.

Trust me, you can hire a ton of small town folks at a decent wage and they'll be a lot more loyal to your company then the Chinese folks who are practically slaves working in squalid conditions.

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

Has Morgan Spurlock Found Osama Bin Laden?

If Michael Moore is America’s number one documentary filmmaker, then after releasing Super Size Me Morgan Spurlock definitely became number 2. Except while Moore makes more point of view movies, Spurlock’s work is a lot closer to being what we think of when throwing around the word “documentary”.

His next project is by far, his riskiest yet. Spurlock has finished his new movie Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?, in which he sets out to do what the United States government has apparently failed to do: Find Osama Bin Laden. The Weinstein Company bought the thing after seeing only 15 minutes of it at the Berlin Film Festival, and here’s where it gets really interesting. Rumor has it that Spurlock actually found Osama Bin Laden.

The film’s director of photography told SlashFilm that Morgan “definitely got the holy grail.” Since the movie is about him hunting Osama, that would make him the holy grail… wouldn’t it? For now though, everyone around the production is keeping things locked down.

I actually enjoyed "super size me" from this man.  However, I want to know a few things:

Is this Hollywood hype?  If so, it's the worst kind of hype.  Getting the American public's hopes up for capturing Osama and if he's just playing it up for publicity, I'm going to be pretty disgusted with him.

If he found Osama, why did he not report his whereabouts to authorities?  That reeks of treason in my book.

If he found Osama, why can't the CIA or any other agency find him?

Personally, with what I've studied about Osama, I'm about 90% sure it's all hype. I find it very hard to believe that Osama would let an American filmmaker within miles of him without trying to kill him.

Secondly, I find it very hard to believe that if he did indeed find him, he wouldn't turn him in.  Who wouldn't want to be known as the guy who captured or at least found Osama?  I know I'd go see any movie the guy puts out from now until the end of time if he did.

But unfortunately, I think it's all hype.  Please prove me wrong Mr. Spurlock, I'm aching to know if you did find him, and why you didn't turn him in if you did.

But please be warned Mr. Spurlock, if you did find him and didn't turn him in, you're going to be a pariah in America.  You might as well find another place to live if that's the case.

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

Sino-U.S. Conflict Brews Over Climate Technology

The U.S. and China, long at odds over protecting intellectual property, are facing off in a new battleground at the U.N. conference on climate change in Bali, Indonesia.

China wants developed nations like the U.S. to share cutting-edge renewable-energy technology at reduced costs with the developing world to help poor nations reduce their dependence on fossil fuels.

But the idea is generating tensions with U.S. officials, because American companies don't want to sell this new technology at cut-rate prices, and they worry that innovative technologies could be illegally copied if they are deployed in China.

Exactly.  China doesn't want to pay for anything it doesn't have to, so why not try to push the US to not only share the technology that we developed, but then China can turn around and get the technology for free?

Here's a thought China:  You have trillions of dollars in reserves, why don't YOU pay for these programs to help third world nations if you care that deeply about them?

Or are you too greedy to "walk the walk"?

You don't seem to mind taking existing technologies from other nations, especially the US via illegal means, so why the hell should we help you look good to these countries?

If you want to play hardball with US companies in trying to steal their secrets via espionage, you can't complain when they give you a big "fuck you" when you ask politely.

Perhaps if you quit trying to screw every dime you can out of everyone around you, you'd have more friends in this world.

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

Moon photo mystery solved

Oh sweet Jesus, we've got "Russia - part 2" on our hands.

During the Cold War, we believed that Russia had this vast amount of military resources and technological advances and it turns out it was all a big sham.

Well now it turns out that the "moon photos" that China is saying they took, have been photoshopped.

It's not exactly a fake, but it ain't exactly real either.

Looks like China's trying to puff up their chests about their "technological achievements", but they seem to have forgotten that everything in the world can be scrutinized within seconds with off the shelf hardware and commercial software and be found to be fake within a few days tops.

There are some very smart people out there with a lot of time on their hands.  I suggest you not try to out smart them, you will fail.

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com

Victim's family sues in 'Jena 6' beating case

Where's Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson's comments on this?  When can we expect them to come out and defend 6 students who beat another student until he needed hospitalization?

I want to see one, just ONE news reporter or interviewer who has either one of these professional "I'm offended" idiots on their show and tell them that they are wrong and they are racist.  I want them to point out Al Sharpton's libelous comments and his lack of apology for the Tawana Brawley case.  I want them to point out the lack of apology for Jesse Jackson's "Hymietown"'s comments.

This student was beaten in a 6-1 fight.  And what do they get as punishment?  How about a guest spot on a BET awards show?

How about this little number:?

 

So when you donate your hard earned money to these "poor kids who are a victim of racism", check out what they did with your money.

What did the victim get?  He got his ass kicked.  He didn't get money for his "defense fund".  He didn't get to be on TV.  He got a bunch of scars and a massive hospital bill:

1412890585_072a6ad93f_o

So when are Al and Jesse going to come to this kids hospital bedside or home and scream about the inequalities this young man got?

Racists.

 

Travis

travis@rightwinglunatic.com

http://forums.rightwinglunatic.com